devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
	James Hartley
	<james.hartley-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Ian Campbell
	<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] i2c: Add Imagination Technologies I2C SCB driver
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:59:17 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54624065.2050202@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1qeaEd-NeoC4Zc3u99WYSojr7HJVxmUweO6taBo8BhAxDJcQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 11/10/2014 05:53 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> Hi Ezequiel,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Ezequiel Garcia
> <ezequiel.garcia-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> From: James Hogan <james.hogan-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> Add support for the IMG I2C Serial Control Bus (SCB) found on the
>> Pistachio and TZ1090 SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> [Ezequiel: code cleaning and rebasing]
>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> A few minor comments below, otherwise:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-img-scb.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-img-scb.c
[..]
>> +
>> +               wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->msg_complete, IMG_I2C_TOUT);
> 
> ... and here?
> 

Right, missed these two.

>> +               del_timer_sync(&i2c->check_timer);
>> +               if (i2c->msg_status)
>> +                       break;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->scb_clk);
>> +
>> +       return i2c->msg_status ? i2c->msg_status : num;
>> +}
> 
>> +static int img_i2c_init(struct img_i2c *i2c)
>> +{
>> +       unsigned int clk_khz, bitrate_khz, clk_period, tckh, tckl, tsdh;
>> +       unsigned int i, ret, data, prescale, inc, int_bitrate;
>> +       unsigned int filt, filt_disable, filt_bypass;
>> +       struct img_i2c_timings timing;
>> +       u32 rev;
>> +
>> +       ret = clk_prepare_enable(i2c->scb_clk);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>> +       rev = img_i2c_readl(i2c, SCB_CORE_REV_REG);
>> +       if ((rev & 0x00ffffff) < 0x00020200) {
>> +               dev_info(i2c->adap.dev.parent,
>> +                        "Unknown hardware revision (%d.%d.%d.%d)\n",
>> +                        (rev >> 24) & 0xff, (rev >> 16) & 0xff,
>> +                        (rev >> 8) & 0xff, rev & 0xff);
>> +               clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->scb_clk);
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (rev == REL_SOC_IP_SCB_2_2_1)
>> +               i2c->need_wr_rd_fence = true;
>> +
>> +       bitrate_khz = i2c->bitrate / 1000;
>> +       clk_khz = clk_get_rate(i2c->scb_clk) / 1000;
>> +
>> +       /* Determine what mode we're in from the bitrate */
>> +       timing = timings[0];
>> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(timings); i++) {
>> +               if (i2c->bitrate <= timings[i].max_bitrate) {
>> +                       timing = timings[i];
>> +                       break;
>> +               }
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /* Find the prescale that would give us that inc (approx delay = 0) */
>> +       prescale = SCB_OPT_INC * clk_khz / (256 * 16 * bitrate_khz);
>> +       prescale = clamp_t(unsigned int, prescale, 1, 8);
>> +       clk_khz /= prescale;
>> +
>> +       /* Setup the clock increment value */
>> +       inc = ((256 * 16 * bitrate_khz) /
>> +              (clk_khz - (16 * bitrate_khz * (clk_khz / 1000) *
>> +                          i2c->busdelay) / 10000));
>> +
>> +       /* Setup the filter clock value */
>> +       filt_bypass = 0;
>> +       filt_disable = 0;
>> +       filt = 0;
>> +       if (clk_khz < 20000) {
>> +               filt_disable = SCB_FILT_DISABLE;
>> +       } else if (clk_khz < 40000) {
>> +               filt_bypass = SCB_FILT_BYPASS;
>> +       } else {
>> +               /* Calculate filter clock */
>> +               filt = ((640000) / ((clk_khz / 1000) * (250 - i2c->busdelay)));
>> +               if ((640000) % ((clk_khz / 1000) * (250 - i2c->busdelay))) {
>> +                       /* Scale up */
>> +                       inc++;
>> +               }
>> +               if (filt > SCB_FILT_INC_MASK)
>> +                       filt = SCB_FILT_INC_MASK;
>> +       }
>> +       data = filt_disable | filt_bypass |
>> +              ((filt & SCB_FILT_INC_MASK) << SCB_FILT_INC_SHIFT) |
>> +              ((inc & SCB_INC_MASK) << SCB_INC_SHIFT) |
>> +              (prescale - 1);
>> +       img_i2c_writel(i2c, SCB_CLK_SET_REG, data);
> 
> Do filt_bypass/filt_disable really need to be separate variables?
> Can't we just use filt in all three cases?
> 

Hm... how about this?

        /* Setup the filter clock value */
        if (clk_khz < 20000) {
                filt = SCB_FILT_DISABLE;
        } else if (clk_khz < 40000) {
                filt = SCB_FILT_BYPASS;
        } else {
                /* Calculate filter clock */
                filt = ((640000) / ((clk_khz / 1000) * (250 - i2c->busdelay)));
                if ((640000) % ((clk_khz / 1000) * (250 - i2c->busdelay))) {
                        /* Scale up */
                        inc++;
                }
                if (filt > SCB_FILT_INC_MASK)
                        filt = SCB_FILT_INC_MASK;

                filt = ((filt & SCB_FILT_INC_MASK) << SCB_FILT_INC_SHIFT) |
                       ((inc & SCB_INC_MASK) << SCB_INC_SHIFT) |
                       (prescale - 1);
        }
        img_i2c_writel(i2c, SCB_CLK_SET_REG, filt);


>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int img_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +       struct img_i2c *i2c = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> +       img_i2c_switch_mode(i2c, MODE_SUSPEND);
>> +
>> +       clk_disable(i2c->sys_clk);
> 
> Why not unprepare as well?
> 

Hm.. seems I got confused here, and thought we couldn't sleep.

Thanks for the review!
-- 
Ezequiel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-11 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-10 19:30 [PATCH v5 0/2] i2c: Imagination Technologies I2C adapter driver Ezequiel Garcia
     [not found] ` <1415647816-16415-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-10 19:30   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] i2c: Add Imagination Technologies I2C SCB driver Ezequiel Garcia
     [not found]     ` <1415647816-16415-2-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-10 20:53       ` Andrew Bresticker
     [not found]         ` <CAL1qeaEd-NeoC4Zc3u99WYSojr7HJVxmUweO6taBo8BhAxDJcQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-11 16:59           ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2014-11-11 20:37       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-11-10 19:30   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] DT: i2c: Add binding document for IMG I2C SCB Ezequiel Garcia
     [not found]     ` <1415647816-16415-3-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-10 20:22       ` Andrew Bresticker
     [not found]         ` <CAL1qeaHG=zVgA+LOQWcaYndyPJPq6Qs18b4Vorj8zXhj8tSeyw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-11 20:39           ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54624065.2050202@imgtec.com \
    --to=ezequiel.garcia-1axoqhu6uovqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=abrestic-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=james.hartley-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=james.hogan-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).