From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff related properties Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:46:28 +0100 Message-ID: <5464C444.4050101@redhat.com> References: <1415885645-24613-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <5464C026.7030300@ti.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5464C026.7030300-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Cc: Stephen Warren , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Luc Verhaegen , Maxime Ripard , David Herrmann , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 11/13/2014 03:28 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 13/11/14 15:34, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> +chosen { >> + framebuffer0: framebuffer@5fc00000 { >> compatible = "simple-framebuffer"; >> - reg = <0x1d385000 (1600 * 1200 * 2)>; >> + reg = <0x5fc00000 (4096 * 1024)>; > > Was there a reason for this change? I changed the node name to match the new bindings text which specifies that the node name must be framebuffer@
, while at it I've taken a real world address range. I assume you refer to the bit where the size of the reg property is changed ? That indeed is not really necessary. Regards, Hans