From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank Rowand Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch to improve device tree structure Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:03:57 -0800 Message-ID: <546CF7AD.8060707@gmail.com> References: <1416199976-21147-1-git-send-email-gaurav.minocha.os@gmail.com> <20141118151026.D2D63C40966@trevor.secretlab.ca> <546BF447.6080300@gmail.com> <546CEFC4.805@gmail.com> Reply-To: frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <546CEFC4.805-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Gaurav Minocha , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/19/2014 11:30 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 11/19/2014 5:56 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: < snip > > I include a patch below to also drop the *next pointer. Not to actually > propose submitting the patch, but to suggest that Gaurav's patch should be > counted as a net of +2 pointers. I expect that you will accept either a > list_head of an hlist_head patch, but if you do not then I will submit the list_head _or_ and hlist_head stupid typos... > below patch to remove *next or a patch to rename *next to match the actual > usage of the field. > > I still do not have a strong opinion, but I am still feeling that the gain > probably does not outweigh the cost. > > -Frank -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html