Re: [PATCH] Patch to improve device tree structure

[Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On 11/19/2014 12:03 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 11/19/2014 11:30 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 11/19/2014 5:56 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Frank Rowand <frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> < snip >
> 
>> I include a patch below to also drop the *next pointer.  Not to actually
>> propose submitting the patch, but to suggest that Gaurav's patch should be
>> counted as a net of +2 pointers.  I expect that you will accept either a
>> list_head of an hlist_head patch, but if you do not then I will submit the
> 
>   list_head _or_ and hlist_head

    list_head _or_ an hlist_head

darn it!

> 
> stupid typos...
> 
>> below patch to remove *next or a patch to rename *next to match the actual
>> usage of the field.
>>
>> I still do not have a strong opinion, but I am still feeling that the gain
>> probably does not outweigh the cost.
>>
>> -Frank
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html