devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, nsekhar@ti.com,
	t-kristo@ti.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: DRA: hwmod: RTC: Add reset function for RTC
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:32:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5473FF68.3070805@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411201644470.9204@utopia.booyaka.com>

Hi Paul,
On Thursday 20 November 2014 10:26 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> 
>> On Monday 17 November 2014 10:13 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> RTC IP have kicker feature which prevents spurious writes to its registers.
>>> In order to write into any of the RTC registers, KICK values has te be
>>> written to KICK registers. Currently hwmod is updating the IDLEMODE in rtc
>>> sysconfig register without writing into any kick register which is a noop.
>>> When autoidle is allowed for rtc, interruts are not received until IDLEMODE
>>> is set to SIDLE_SMART_WKUP.
>>> Adding a reset function to unlock RTC registers so that IDLEMODE is
>>> updated.
>> Ping..!!
>> Is this patch acceptable?
> 
> Lokesh
> 
> 1. This looks like a fix.  Is this intended to go in as a v3.18-rc patch, 
> or against v3.19?  If so it would be very helpful for the maintainers if 
> you were to state that somewhere.
Yes. This is a fix, intended to go in 3.18-rc. Sorry should have
mentioned it.
> 
> 2. Your patch unlocks the RTC registers, but never relocks it.  This seems 
> to defeat the point of the spurious write protection.  Shouldn't your 
> patch only unlock the RTC immediately before the hwmod code touches the 
> RTC registers, and then relock it immediately afterwards, per SPRUHZ6 
> section 23.4.3.3?  If so then the .reset function pointer is the wrong 
> place for this; I would suggest adding some .lock and .unlock function 
> pointers that are to be called before and after any register write to the 
> IP block.
Yeah I agree with you.
Currently rtc driver unlocks these kick registers in probe and leaves it unlocks for
further use.
But if hwmod does unlock and lock for every sysconfig write driver should also
implement unlock and lock for every rtc register write, which adds an extra overhead.
I am not sure if some one writes into rtc registers other than hwmod and driver.
IMO we can leave it unlocked as the driver does.
> 
> 3. Your macros don't mention DRA7xx specifically.  Does this sequence 
> apply to some other TI chips, or just DRA7xx?  Please document this in a 
> comment above the macros, and possibly change the name of the macros to 
> refer to DRA7XX.
This sequence applies to AM43xx and AM33xx also. So made it generic.
Ill document it.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh
> 
> 
> - Paul
> 
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Lokesh
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.h          |  1 +
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c |  1 +
>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_reset.c    | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.h
>>> index 512f809..3703f99 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.h
>>> @@ -744,6 +744,7 @@ const char *omap_hwmod_get_main_clk(struct omap_hwmod *oh);
>>>   */
>>>  
>>>  extern int omap_hwmod_aess_preprogram(struct omap_hwmod *oh);
>>> +int omap_hwmod_rtc_unlock(struct omap_hwmod *oh);
>>>  
>>>  /*
>>>   * Chip variant-specific hwmod init routines - XXX should be converted
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c
>>> index 5684f11..90e1df4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c
>>> @@ -1584,6 +1584,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_class_sysconfig dra7xx_rtcss_sysc = {
>>>  static struct omap_hwmod_class dra7xx_rtcss_hwmod_class = {
>>>  	.name	= "rtcss",
>>>  	.sysc	= &dra7xx_rtcss_sysc,
>>> +	.reset	= &omap_hwmod_rtc_unlock,
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  /* rtcss */
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_reset.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_reset.c
>>> index 65e186c..b825a28 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_reset.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_reset.c
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@
>>>  
>>>  #include "omap_hwmod.h"
>>>  
>>> +#define RTC_KICK0_REG_OFFSET	0x6c
>>> +#define RTC_KICK1_REG_OFFSET	0x70
>>> +
>>> +#define RTC_KICK0_VALUE		0x83E70B13
>>> +#define RTC_KICK1_VALUE		0x95A4F1E0
>>> +
>>>  /**
>>>   * omap_hwmod_aess_preprogram - enable AESS internal autogating
>>>   * @oh: struct omap_hwmod *
>>> @@ -51,3 +57,20 @@ int omap_hwmod_aess_preprogram(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
>>>  
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * omap_hwmod_rtc_unlock - Reset and unlock the Kicker mechanism.
>>> + * @oh: struct omap_hwmod *
>>> + *
>>> + * RTC IP have kicker feature.  This prevents spurious writes to its registers.
>>> + * In order to write into any of the RTC registers, KICK values has te be
>>> + * written in respective KICK registers. This is needed for hwmod to write into
>>> + * sysconfig register.
>>> + */
>>> +int omap_hwmod_rtc_unlock(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
>>> +{
>>> +	omap_hwmod_write(RTC_KICK0_VALUE, oh, RTC_KICK0_REG_OFFSET);
>>> +	omap_hwmod_write(RTC_KICK1_VALUE, oh, RTC_KICK1_REG_OFFSET);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> - Paul
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-25  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-17  4:43 [RFC PATCH] ARM: DRA: hwmod: RTC: Add reset function for RTC Lokesh Vutla
2014-11-20  9:32 ` Lokesh Vutla
2014-11-20 16:56   ` Paul Walmsley
2014-11-25  4:02     ` Lokesh Vutla [this message]
2014-11-26  7:04       ` Paul Walmsley
2014-11-27  4:40         ` Lokesh Vutla
2015-01-02 22:53         ` Paul Walmsley
     [not found]           ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1501022252580.27058-rwI8Ez+7Ko+d5PgPZx9QOdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-12 16:41             ` Paul Walmsley
2015-02-13  5:37               ` Lokesh Vutla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5473FF68.3070805@ti.com \
    --to=lokeshvutla@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).