From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>,
khilman@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, galak@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, msivasub@codeaurora.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/10] cpuidle driver for QCOM SoCs: 8064, 8074, 8084
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:53:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5476E66F.2080209@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417065854-37745-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org>
Lina,
a night for me has passed and I have in the meantime 3 new versions of
the patchset obviously done in the hurry and not tested.
Furthermore the change log fails to give the details, "Address review
comments on spm.c" is just a clue and when I look at the spm.c code all
the comments where not addressed.
Please, have a look at the "static bool cpuidle_drv_init;", remove it
and look closely at the idle callbacks error handling in the cpuidle driver.
Thanks
-- Daniel
On 11/27/2014 06:24 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
> Dependent patchsets -
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/4/767
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg10799.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg10795.html
>
> Changes since v12:
> - Minor fixes
> - Added Reviewed-by
>
> Changes since v11:
> - Address review comments on spm.c
> - Commenting style fixes
> - Added Reviewed-by
>
> Changes since v10:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree@vger.kernel.org/msg51880.html ]
> - Address review comments
> - Added Acked-by and Reviewed-by
>
> Changes since v9:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg11714.html ]
> - Address review comments on v9
>
> Changes since v8:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg11473.html ]
> - Flatten out the file structure - merge pm.c into spm.c after discussions
> - Add a new function to set warm boot address, in scm-boot.c
> - Support for 8064 (New)
> - Tested on 8074, 8084. 8064 was tested with a WIP tree
> - Address review comments from v8
> - Looking into possiblility of initializing the cpuidle device for a cpu,
> only when the corresponding spm device is probed successfully.
>
> Changes since v7:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg11199.html ]
> - Address review comments
> - Tested on 8974 but not 8084
> - WFI renamed to Standby
> - Update commit text with original author and link to the downstream tree
>
> Changes since v6:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg11012.html ]
> - SPM device nodes merged with existing SAW DT nodes
> - SPM register information is handled within the driver
> - Clean up from using 'msm' to 'qcom'
> - Shorten some enumerations as well
> - Review comments from v6 addressed
> - New: Support for 8084 SoC
> - Not tested. I do not have a board with this SoC, but the SPM
> configuration should be identical for WFI and SPC
>
> Changes since v5:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg10559.html ]
> - Merge spm-devices.c and spm.c into one file and one patch
> - Simplify implementation of the driver.
> - Update documentation mapping the DT properties with corresponding
> SPM register information.
> - Removed scm-boot changes for quad core warmboot, its has been pulled in.
>
> Changes since v4:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg10327.html ]
> - Update to the v8 of ARM generic idle states patches
> - Use platform device model for cpuidle-qcom
> - Clean up msm-pm.c to remove unnecessary include files and functions
> - Update commit text and documentation for all idle states
> - Remove scm-boot relocate patch from this series, submitted earlier
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg10518.html ]
>
> Changes since v3:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg10288.html ]
> - Fix CONFIG_QCOM_PM Kconfig as bool
> - More clean ups in spm.c and spm-devices.c
> - Removed and re-organized data structures to make initialization simple
> - Remove export of sequence flush functions
> - Updated commit text
> - Comments for use of barriers.
> - Rebase on top of 3.17-rc1
>
> Changes since v2:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg10148.html ]
> - Prune all the drivers to support basic WFI and power down cpuidle
> functionality. Remove debug code.
> - Integrate KConfig changes into the drivers' patches.
> - Use Lorenzo's ARM idle-states patches as the basis for reading cpuidle
> c-states from DT.
> [ http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=140794514812383&w=2 ]
> - Incorporate review comments
> - Rebase on top of 3.16
>
> Changes since v1/RFC:
> [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg10065.html ]
> - Remove hotplug from the patch series. Will submit it separately.
> - Fix SPM drivers per the review comments
> - Modify patch sequence to compile SPM drivers independent of msm-pm, so as to
> allow wfi() calls to use SPM even without SoC interface driver.
>
> 8074/8084/8064 like any ARM SoC can do architectural clock gating, that helps save
> on power, but not enough of leakage power. Leakage power of the SoC can be
> further reduced by turning off power to the core. To aid this, every core (cpu
> and L2) is accompanied by a Sub-system Power Manager (SPM), that can be
> configured to indicate the low power mode, the core would be put into and the
> SPM programs the peripheral h/w accordingly to enter low power and turn off the
> power rail to the core.
>
> The idle invocation hierarchy -
>
> CPUIDLE
> |
> cpuidle-qcom.c [CPUIdle driver]
> |
> ------> spm.c [SPM driver]
> |
> ------> scm-boot.c [SCM interface layer]
> |
> ------------------------|--------------------------
> (EL) Secure Monitor Code
> |
> |
> wfi();
> ------------------------|--------------------------
> (HW) [CPU] {clock gate}
> |
> -----> [SPM] {statemachine}
>
>
> The patchset does the following -
>
> - Introduce the SPM driver to control power to the core
> - Add device bindings for 8974, 8084, 8064 CPU SPM devices
> - Add cpuidle driver for QCOM cpus, using ARM generic idle state definitions.
> - Add device bindings for 8974, 8084, 8064 idle-states - WFI and SPC
>
> Thanks,
> Lina
>
>
>
>
> Lina Iyer (10):
> qcom: scm: Move scm-boot files to drivers/soc/qcom/ and
> include/soc/qcom
> qcom: scm: Add SCM warmboot support for quad core SoCs
> qcom: spm: Add Subsystem Power Manager driver
> arm: dts: qcom: Add power-controller device node for 8074 Krait CPUs
> arm: dts: qcom: Add power-controller device node for 8084 Krait CPUs
> arm: dts: qcom: Update power-controller device node for 8064 Krait
> CPUs
> qcom: cpuidle: Add cpuidle driver for QCOM cpus
> arm: dts: qcom: Add idle states device nodes for 8074
> arm: dts: qcom: Add idle states device nodes for 8084
> arm: dts: qcom: Add idle state device nodes for 8064
>
> .../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,idle-state.txt | 81 +++++
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,saw2.txt | 31 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 36 ++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 46 ++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 46 ++-
> arch/arm/mach-qcom/Makefile | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-qcom/platsmp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 7 +
> drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom.c | 78 +++++
> drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 3 +-
> .../arm/mach-qcom => drivers/soc/qcom}/scm-boot.c | 37 ++-
> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c | 327 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/soc/qcom/pm.h | 31 ++
> .../arm/mach-qcom => include/soc/qcom}/scm-boot.h | 3 +-
> 16 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,idle-state.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-qcom.c
> rename {arch/arm/mach-qcom => drivers/soc/qcom}/scm-boot.c (59%)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> create mode 100644 include/soc/qcom/pm.h
> rename {arch/arm/mach-qcom => include/soc/qcom}/scm-boot.h (91%)
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-27 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 5:24 [PATCH v13 00/10] cpuidle driver for QCOM SoCs: 8064, 8074, 8084 Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 01/10] qcom: scm: Move scm-boot files to drivers/soc/qcom/ and include/soc/qcom Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 02/10] qcom: scm: Add SCM warmboot support for quad core SoCs Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 03/10] qcom: spm: Add Subsystem Power Manager driver Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 8:44 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2014-12-01 17:57 ` Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 8:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-12-01 18:50 ` Lina Iyer
2014-12-02 9:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-12-02 15:35 ` Lina Iyer
2014-12-02 15:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-27 15:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-12-01 18:57 ` Lina Iyer
2014-12-02 11:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-02 15:52 ` Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 04/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add power-controller device node for 8074 Krait CPUs Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 05/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add power-controller device node for 8084 " Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 06/10] arm: dts: qcom: Update power-controller device node for 8064 " Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 07/10] qcom: cpuidle: Add cpuidle driver for QCOM cpus Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 08/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add idle states device nodes for 8074 Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 09/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add idle states device nodes for 8084 Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 10/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add idle state device nodes for 8064 Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 8:53 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5476E66F.2080209@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=msivasub@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).