From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laszlo Ersek Subject: Re: [kernel PATCH] devicetree: document ARM bindings for QEMU's Firmware Config interface Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:49:31 +0100 Message-ID: <54787D6B.5000302@redhat.com> References: <1417177604-21194-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> <4081425.dh6XptxTnn@wuerfel> <54787715.6030407@redhat.com> <20141128133300.GG25883@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141128133300.GG25883@leverpostej> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "peter.maydell-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/28/14 14:33, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:22:29PM +0000, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 11/28/14 13:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> We don't normally list contiguous registers separately. Maybe just round >>> up to one page and make the register property >>> >>> reg = <0x0 0x9020000 0x0 0x1000>; >> >> The registers are not necessarily placed shoulder to shoulder (it's not >> a requirement in the QEMU source). > > It might not be at the moment, but if no-one separates them it could be > a requirement for using this binding. Is there any benefit to having > them separated? I couldn't name any. Thanks Laszlo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html