From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thor Thayer Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv5 5/5] arm: dts: Add Altera L2 Cache and OCRAM EDAC Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:51:44 -0600 Message-ID: <547DFC30.304@opensource.altera.com> References: <1415751263-1830-1-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <1415751263-1830-6-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <546BB27A.20405@opensource.altera.com> <547CD3ED.1080804@opensource.altera.com> <20141202150118.GM23671@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141202150118.GM23671@leverpostej> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: "bp@alien8.de" , "dougthompson@xmission.com" , "m.chehab@samsung.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , "galak@codeaurora.org" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "dinguyen@opensource.altera.com" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "tthayer.linux@gmail.com" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/02/2014 09:01 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Thor, > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 08:47:41PM +0000, Thor Thayer wrote: >> Hi Boris, >> >> On 11/18/2014 02:56 PM, Thor Thayer wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On 11/11/2014 06:14 PM, tthayer@opensource.altera.com wrote: >>>> From: Thor Thayer >>>> >>>> Adding the device tree entries and bindings needed to support >>>> the Altera L2 cache and On-Chip RAM EDAC. This patch relies upon >>>> an earlier patch to declare and setup On-chip RAM properly. >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg51117.html >>> >>> Any comments on these devicetree additions? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Thor >>>> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer >>>> --- >>>> v2: Remove OCRAM declaration and reference prior patch. >>>> >>>> v3-5: No Change >>>> --- >> >> I originally submitted this series on November 11, 2014. >> >> I haven't received any comments or ACKs on the device tree patch portion >> (patch 5 of 5). According to >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt, if the patch >> hasn't been Acked after a couple of weeks, the maintainer can pull the >> changes if they are comfortable with those changes. > > Apologies it has taken so long for this to be looked at. Unfortunately > my inbox is overflowing (as are all of ours) and things fall by the > wayside. I am sorry that this has lead to such a delayed response, > especially given that it was negative. > > I'll try to keep up with this a bit more actively. > > Thanks, > Mark. > Hi Mark, Thank you for reviewing this. I have seen how busy the device tree ML is so I completely understand. You have reviewed previous patch revisions in this series - thanks. I thought that I'd addressed most of the issues (in some cases by explaining my implementation) and since I hadn't heard anything, I assumed there weren't concerns. Thanks again, Thor