From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: additional compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:29:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5497447c-023b-4837-a5e2-b465ba2f624d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42677f2d-190c-4043-a61d-8bfba581a764@broadcom.com>
On 06/12/2023 17:32, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 12/6/2023 3:09 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/12/2023 19:47, Markus Mayer wrote:
>>> Add versioned compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE. These take the form
>>> brcm,dpfe-cpu-v<N> where <N> is a number from 1 to 4.
>>>
>>> These API version related compatible strings are more specific than the
>>> catch-all "brcm,dpfe-cpu" and more generic than chip-specific compatible
>>> strings.
>>
>> None of this explains: Why? I don't see any point in this and commit
>> does not explain.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml | 8 +++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
>>> index 08cbdcddfead..6dffa7b62baf 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ properties:
>>> - enum:
>>> - brcm,bcm7271-dpfe-cpu
>>> - brcm,bcm7268-dpfe-cpu
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v1
>>> + - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v2
>>> + - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v3
>>> + - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v4
>>
>> No, that's just wrong. So you want to say bcm7271 is brcm,dpfe-cpu-v4?
>
> No as the example shows it "speaks" API v1.
Example is not a binding. It does not matter except of validating the
binding. This is just incorrect.
>
> I would be inclined to completely remove the chip specific compatible
> strings from the binding because they are not sufficient or descriptive
> enough to determine which API version is being spoken, since the
> firmware is unfortunately allowed to change major APIs (and the
> messaging format, because why not?) at a moments notice.
Then versions do not give you anything more.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 18:47 [PATCH 0/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: support DPFE API v4 Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: additional compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE Markus Mayer
2023-12-06 11:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 16:32 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 17:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-12-06 17:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 17:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-05 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: introduce version-specific compatible strings Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 19:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 16:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 17:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-05 18:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: support DPFE API v4 Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 19:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 16:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 17:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 18:48 ` Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 18:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: introduce best-effort API detection Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 19:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 16:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: support DPFE API v4 Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5497447c-023b-4837-a5e2-b465ba2f624d@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmayer@broadcom.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).