devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: additional compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:29:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5497447c-023b-4837-a5e2-b465ba2f624d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42677f2d-190c-4043-a61d-8bfba581a764@broadcom.com>

On 06/12/2023 17:32, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/6/2023 3:09 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/12/2023 19:47, Markus Mayer wrote:
>>> Add versioned compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE. These take the form
>>> brcm,dpfe-cpu-v<N> where <N> is a number from 1 to 4.
>>>
>>> These API version related compatible strings are more specific than the
>>> catch-all "brcm,dpfe-cpu" and more generic than chip-specific compatible
>>> strings.
>>
>> None of this explains: Why? I don't see any point in this and commit
>> does not explain.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml        | 8 +++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
>>> index 08cbdcddfead..6dffa7b62baf 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,dpfe-cpu.yaml
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ properties:
>>>         - enum:
>>>             - brcm,bcm7271-dpfe-cpu
>>>             - brcm,bcm7268-dpfe-cpu
>>> +      - enum:
>>> +          - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v1
>>> +          - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v2
>>> +          - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v3
>>> +          - brcm,dpfe-cpu-v4
>>
>> No, that's just wrong. So you want to say bcm7271 is brcm,dpfe-cpu-v4?
> 
> No as the example shows it "speaks" API v1.

Example is not a binding. It does not matter except of validating the
binding. This is just incorrect.

> 
> I would be inclined to completely remove the chip specific compatible 
> strings from the binding because they are not sufficient or descriptive 
> enough to determine which API version is being spoken, since the 
> firmware is unfortunately allowed to change major APIs (and the 
> messaging format, because why not?) at a moments notice.

Then versions do not give you anything more.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-06 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-05 18:47 [PATCH 0/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: support DPFE API v4 Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory: additional compatible strings for Broadcom DPFE Markus Mayer
2023-12-06 11:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 16:32     ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 17:29       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-12-06 17:36         ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 17:42           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-05 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: introduce version-specific compatible strings Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 19:05   ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 16:19     ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 17:33       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-05 18:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: support DPFE API v4 Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 19:05   ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:10   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 16:18     ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 17:31       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 18:48         ` Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 18:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: introduce best-effort API detection Markus Mayer
2023-12-05 19:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:13   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-06 16:24     ` Florian Fainelli
2023-12-06 11:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] memory: brcmstb_dpfe: support DPFE API v4 Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5497447c-023b-4837-a5e2-b465ba2f624d@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmayer@broadcom.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).