From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@st.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>,
Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Tanmay
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@stlinux.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] PCI: st: Provide support for the sti PCIe controller
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:42:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5497A83D.5060108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418812486-12394-4-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org>
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 04:04 PM, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
> sti pcie is built around a Synopsis Designware PCIe IP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 5 +
> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c | 713 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 719 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pci-st.c
>
[...]
> +static int st_pcie_abort_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
> + struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
You should have modification here to populate registers having cfg read
values by 0xFFFFFFFF.
I would suggest to have a look here:
drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c:keystone_pcie_fault
> +/*
> + * The PCI express core IP expects the following arrangement on it's address
> + * bus (slv_haddr) when driving config cycles.
> + * bus_number [31:24]
> + * dev_number [23:19]
> + * func_number [18:16]
> + * unused [15:12]
> + * ext_reg_number [11:8]
> + * reg_number [7:2]
> + *
> + * Bits [15:12] are unused.
> + *
> + * In the glue logic there is a 64K region of address space that can be
> + * written/read to generate config cycles. The base address of this is
> + * controlled by CFG_BASE_ADDRESS. There are 8 16 bit registers called
> + * FUNC0_BDF_NUM to FUNC8_BDF_NUM. These split the bottom half of the 64K
> + * window into 8 regions at 4K boundaries. These control the bus,device and
> + * function number you are trying to talk to.
> + *
> + * The decision on whether to generate a type 0 or type 1 access is controlled
> + * by bits 15:12 of the address you write to. If they are zero, then a type 0
> + * is generated, if anything else it will be a type 1. Thus the bottom 4K
> + * region controlled by FUNC0_BDF_NUM can only generate type 0, all the others
> + * can only generate type 1.
> + *
> + * We only use FUNC0_BDF_NUM and FUNC1_BDF_NUM. Which one you use is selected
> + * by bit 12 of the address you write to. The selected register is then used
> + * for the top 16 bits of the slv_haddr to form the bus/dev/func, bit 15:12 are
> + * wired to zero, and bits 11:2 form the address of the register you want to
> + * read in config space.
> + *
> + * We always write FUNC0_BDF_NUM as a 32 bit write. So if we want type 1
> + * accesses we have to shift by 16 so in effect we are writing to FUNC1_BDF_NUM
> + */
> +static inline u32 bdf_num(int bus, int devfn, int is_root_bus)
> +{
> + return ((bus << 8) | devfn) << (is_root_bus ? 0 : 16);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned config_addr(int where, int is_root_bus)
> +{
> + return (where & ~3) | (!is_root_bus << 12);
> +}
> +
> +static int st_pcie_rd_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
> + unsigned int devfn, int where, int size,
> + u32 *val)
> +{
> + u32 data;
> + u32 bdf;
> + struct st_pcie *pcie = to_st_pcie(pp);
> + int is_root_bus = pci_is_root_bus(bus);
> + int retry_count = 0;
> + int ret;
> + void __iomem *addr;
> +
> + /*
> + * Prerequisite
> + * PCI express devices will respond to all config type 0 cycles, since
> + * they are point to point links. Thus to avoid probing for multiple
> + * devices on the root, dw-pcie already check for us if it is on the
> + * root bus / other slots. Also, dw-pcie checks for the link being up
> + * as we will hang if we issue a config request and the link is down.
> + * A switch will reject requests for slots it knows do not exist.
> + */
> + bdf = bdf_num(bus->number, devfn, is_root_bus);
> + addr = pcie->config_area + config_addr(where,
> + bus->parent->number == pp->root_bus_nr);
> +retry:
> + /* Set the config packet devfn */
> + writel_relaxed(bdf, pp->dbi_base + FUNC0_BDF_NUM);
> + readl_relaxed(pp->dbi_base + FUNC0_BDF_NUM);
> +
> + ret = dw_pcie_cfg_read(addr, where, size, &data);
> +
> + /*
> + * This is intended to help with when we are probing the bus. The
> + * problem is that the wrapper logic doesn't have any way to
> + * interrogate if the configuration request failed or not.
> + * On the ARM we actually get a real bus error.
> + *
> + * Unfortunately this means it is impossible to tell the difference
> + * between when a device doesn't exist (the switch will return a UR
> + * completion) or the device does exist but isn't yet ready to accept
> + * configuration requests (the device will return a CRS completion)
> + *
> + * The result of this is that we will miss devices when probing.
> + *
> + * So if we are trying to read the dev/vendor id on devfn 0 and we
> + * appear to get zero back, then we retry the request. We know that
> + * zero can never be a valid device/vendor id. The specification says
> + * we must retry for up to a second before we decide the device is
Not sure if retry has to be part of software. This might already be done
by hardware.
> + * dead. If we are still dead then we assume there is nothing there and
> + * return ~0
> + *
> + * The downside of this is that we incur a delay of 1s for every pci
> + * express link that doesn't have a device connected.
> + */
> + if (((where & ~3) == 0) && devfn == 0 && (data == 0 || data == ~0)) {
> + if (retry_count++ < 1000) {
> + mdelay(1);
> + goto retry;
> + } else {
> + *val = ~0;
> + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
> + }
> + }
Have you found a situation with any of the card when your retry_count >
0 and < 1000 at this point. If not then, I think modifying abort
handler will solve your issue.
> +
> + *val = data;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
~Pratyush
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-22 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-17 10:34 [PATCH 0/5] PCI: st: provide support for dw pcie Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2014-12-17 10:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: STi: Kconfig update for PCIe support Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2014-12-17 10:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] PCI: st: Add Device Tree bindings for sti pcie Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2014-12-17 22:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-19 12:36 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-01-19 13:04 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-12-22 4:45 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-12-17 10:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI: st: Provide support for the sti PCIe controller Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2014-12-17 22:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-19 12:37 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-01-19 13:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-21 15:47 ` Gabriel Fernandez
[not found] ` <CAG374jCRByNZuuYxi5+-mKvV7p5-tCf2G+8mTYfzU4rRV4yfYQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-21 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-21 19:59 ` Lucas Stach
2015-01-19 13:08 ` Gabriel Fernandez
[not found] ` <1418812486-12394-4-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-18 6:03 ` Jingoo Han
2015-01-19 12:38 ` Gabriel Fernandez
[not found] ` <000f01d01a88$60405e50$20c11af0$%han-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-19 13:06 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-12-22 5:12 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2015-01-12 18:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-01-21 15:32 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-12-17 10:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI: designware: Add setup bus-related to pcie_host_ops Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2014-12-17 22:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-18 4:58 ` Jingoo Han
2015-01-19 12:38 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2015-01-19 13:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-19 15:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-01-19 13:09 ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-12-17 10:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI: st: disable IO support Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2014-12-17 14:01 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-01-21 15:49 ` Gabriel Fernandez
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-10 7:38 [PATCH 0/5] PCI: st: provide support for dw pcie Gabriel FERNANDEZ
2015-04-10 7:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI: st: Provide support for the sti PCIe controller Gabriel FERNANDEZ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5497A83D.5060108@redhat.com \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=damm@opensource.se \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@st.com \
--cc=gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org \
--cc=gabriel.fernandez@st.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
--cc=mohit.kumar@st.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).