From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Karol Wrona <k.wrona-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Kyungmin Park
<kyungmin.park-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Karol Wrona <wrona.vy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: sensorhub: Add sensorhub bindings
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:29:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <549D549C.1000803@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548FDFA2.1090002-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
On 16/12/14 07:30, Karol Wrona wrote:
> On 12/06/2014 03:29 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 05/12/14 19:54, Karol Wrona wrote:
>>> Add sensorhub bindings for sensorhub on Galaxy Gear 2.
>>>
>>> Change-Id: I4ee25aef33c21a4662de230841de9a8684f2c26b
>>> Signed-off-by: Karol Wrona <k.wrona-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Looks good to me. Comments inline. Note I either need a device tree
>> ack or a long delay before I can take this though. Unlikely to get the
>> device tree ack as you haven't cc'd the maintainers or list ;)
> I am curious about DT community opinion and I prefer to know it before
> v4 sending.
They have a lot of patches to review, so might take a while ;)
>
>>
>> I've added the cc's. Please make sure future versions have them or you'll
>> just be slowing the process down (particularly if no one notices they
>> are missing!)
> Thanks, I will remember that.
>>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..2aca0c3
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/sensorhub.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
>>> +Samsung Sensorhub driver
>>> +
>>> +Sensorhub is a MCU which manages several sensors and also plays the role
>>> +of a virtual sensor device.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: "samsung,sensorhub-rinato" or "samsung,sensorhub-thermostat"
>>> +- spi-max-frequency: max SPI clock frequency
>>> +- interrupt-parent: interrupt parent
>>> +- interrupts: communication interrupt
>>> +- ap-mcu-gpio: [out] ap to sensorhub line - used during communication
>>> +- mcu-ap-gpio: [in] sensorhub to ap - used during communication
>>> +- mcu-reset: [out] sensorhub reset
>> as commented in previous patch, why do the first two have -gpio and the
>> third not?
> Ok, all 3 will have "gpios" ending
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +- sensor's nodes:
>>> + compatible = "samsung,mpu6500-accel"
>>> + compatible = "samsung,mpu6500-gyro"
>>> + compatible = "samsung,adpd142"
>>> +
>>> +Sensor compatibles are used to match proper sensor driver to real sensor on
>>> +the board. The firmware does not give such information, so it helps to specify
>>> +some sensors properties. Sensors have "samsung" prefixes because frequently
>>> +they will not have much in common with sensors used without sensorhub because
>>> +it can do some data processing.
>> We'll keep that under review. Might make sense, sometimes, to unify the
>> drivers. The different compatible will probably still be needed, but if
>> these devices proliferate I don't want two drivers for everything that
>> gets stuck behind them.
> I think that sensorhub is very similar hid-sensor (without hotpluging) where
> every sensor type has its own representation. The real sensors are not driven
> directly but by external MCU so very often these sensors will not have much
> common with real ones. So I wonder if it could be better to resign from these
> sensor compatibles and represent each sensor as mfd cell so optional properties
> probably will dropped (?)
Might do.
> Generally I intended to have i.e. one ssp-accel driver if they use another
> accelerometer then mpu6500 the buffering manner and sysfs will be handled in the
> same way. I think I was mistaken with these compatibles. There is also some
> probability that the firmware will be fixed someday and it will be able to tell
> more about sensor then the type.
Would be good - particularly if we start to get lots of variants out in the wild.
>
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> + shub_spi: shub {
>>> + compatible = "samsung,sensorhub-rinato";
>>> + spi-max-frequency = <5000000>;
>>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpx0>;
>>> + interrupts = <2 0>;
>>> + ap-mcu-gpio = <&gpx0 0 0>;
>>> + mcu-ap-gpio = <&gpx0 4 0>;
>>> + mcu-reset = <&gpx0 5 0>;
>>> + sensor@0 {
>>> + compatible = "samsung,mpu6500-accel";
>>> + };
>>> + sensor@1 {
>>> + compatible = "samsung,mpu6500-gyro";
>>> + };
>>> + sensor@2 {
>>> + compatible = "samsung,adpd142";
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>>
>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-26 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1417809290-9662-1-git-send-email-k.wrona@samsung.com>
[not found] ` <1417809290-9662-3-git-send-email-k.wrona@samsung.com>
[not found] ` <1417809290-9662-3-git-send-email-k.wrona-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-06 14:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: sensorhub: Add sensorhub bindings Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <548312D9.3070104-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-16 7:30 ` Karol Wrona
[not found] ` <548FDFA2.1090002-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-26 12:29 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=549D549C.1000803@kernel.org \
--to=jic23-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=k.wrona-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wrona.vy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).