From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
"Ezequiel Garcia" <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
"Boris BREZILLON" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Lior Amsalem" <alior@marvell.com>,
"Tawfik Bayouk" <tawfik@marvell.com>,
"Nadav Haklai" <nadavh@marvell.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: mvebu: Armada 385 GP: Add regulators to the SATA port
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:10:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B8E38A.6020709@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B8D97B.3090908@free-electrons.com>
Hi,
On 16-01-15 10:27, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On 16/01/2015 09:17, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15-01-15 15:09, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>> Add the regulators to each SATA port.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-388-gp.dts | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-388-gp.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-388-gp.dts
>>> index 4df22bf91683..590b383db323 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-388-gp.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-388-gp.dts
>>> @@ -173,6 +173,16 @@
>>> status = "okay";
>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + sata0: sata-port@0 {
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + target-supply = <®_5v_sata0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sata1: sata-port@1 {
>>> + reg = <1>;
>>> + target-supply = <®_5v_sata1>;
>>> + };
>>> };
>>>
>>> sata@e0000 {
>>> @@ -181,6 +191,16 @@
>>> status = "okay";
>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + sata2: sata-port@0 {
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + target-supply = <®_5v_sata2>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sata3: sata-port@1 {
>>> + reg = <1>;
>>> + target-supply = <®_5v_sata3>;
>>> + };
>>> };
>>>
>>> sdhci@d8000 {
>>> @@ -278,6 +298,112 @@
>>> regulator-always-on;
>>> gpio = <&expander0 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + reg_sata0: pwr-sata0 {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "pwr_en_sata0";
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> +
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + reg_5v_sata0: v5-sata0 {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "v5.0-sata0";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + vin-supply = <®_sata0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + reg_12v_sata0: v12-sata0 {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "v12.0-sata0";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <12000000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <12000000>;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + vin-supply = <®_sata0>;
>>> + };
>>
>> AFAIK the separate v5 / 12v regulators you're creating here
>> are not used anywhere. So I guess there just here to
>> accurately / completely describe the power topology ?
>
> Yes it was the point.
Ok.
>>> +
>>> + reg_sata1: pwr-sata1 {
>>> + regulator-name = "pwr_en_sata1";
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <12000000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <12000000>;
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>
>>
>> The always on here seems to a bit weird, wasn't the
>> whole purpose of this patch set to teach ahci_platform
>> to turn it on as needed ?
>
> Maybe I misunderstood the regulator binding, but I thought
> that (once the suspend will be available on this platform) I
> could use:
>
> regulator-state-mem {
> regulator-off-in-suspend;
> };
>
>>
>> You do probably want to put a regulator-boot-on here so
>> that disks do not get an unwanted powercycle (bad for
>> their lifetime) when the firmware has already turned on
>> the disk. Downside of using regulator-boot-on is that if
>> the power is not actually turned on no power-on-delay is
>
> That's why I didn't use it
>
>> done, but we're not using a power on delay anyways.
>
> But if regulator-always-on prevent to switch it off in
> suspend then yes using regulator-boot-on is better.
AFAIK regulator-always-on means exactly that and thus likely
is not what you want. As for using regulator-off-in-suspend
that is not necessary as the suspend method for the acpi
driver will already turn it off.
Note that you can test this today by doing (IIRC):
echo devices > /sys/power/pm_test
echo mem > /sys/power/state
This is how I tested ahci_platform suspend handling on
the freescale imx processor on the wandboard.
It is probably a good idea to use regulator-boot-on and
then test things this way, and if that works use
regulator-boot-on.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-16 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 14:09 [PATCH v4 0/4] ata: libahci: Allow using a regulator for each port Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-15 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ata: libahci: Clean-up the ahci_platform_en/disable_phys functions Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-15 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] Documentation: bindings: Add the regulator property to the sub-nodes AHCI bindings Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-15 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-15 14:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: mvebu: Armada 385 GP: Add regulators to the SATA port Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-16 8:17 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-16 9:27 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-01-16 10:10 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-01-16 12:37 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-16 14:27 ` Gregory CLEMENT
[not found] ` <54B91FB4.5080707-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-16 15:34 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-16 19:13 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-16 19:44 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-16 19:12 ` Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <54B9629C.9090800-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-16 20:25 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-17 8:48 ` Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <54BA21F9.5050408-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-17 13:14 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-17 14:28 ` Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <54BA7197.40301-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-18 12:35 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-18 15:29 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-18 19:28 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <1421330978-9694-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-16 7:58 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] ata: libahci: Allow using a regulator for each port Hans de Goede
2015-01-19 14:54 ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-19 15:05 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B8E38A.6020709@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).