From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] usb: extcon: Fix USB-Host cable name Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:05:49 +0200 Message-ID: <54CB8FBD.6050701@ti.com> References: <1422274532-9488-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1422274532-9488-3-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <54CB6539.1040703@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54CB6539.1040703@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: balbi@ti.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com Cc: tony@atomide.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, george.cherian@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 30/01/15 13:04, Roger Quadros wrote: > Felipe & Chanwoo, > > On 26/01/15 14:15, Roger Quadros wrote: >> The recommended name for USB-Host cable state is "USB-Host" and not >> "USB-HOST" as per drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c extcon_cable_name. >> >> Change all instances of "USB-HOST" to "USB-Host". >> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros >> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi > > This patch has no dependency to the rest so can be picked up as soon as possible. > > Do you think it is better to go via the USB tree? > If yes then Chanwoo, can you please Ack this one? Thanks. > > This would mean that only the first patch needs to go through extcon tree as Tony > will pick the rest. Hold on. Let's first decide what we really want to go ahead with "USB-Host" or "USB-HOST". cheers, -roger