From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:15:32 +0530 Message-ID: <54ED455C.3010700@linaro.org> References: <7ha904b6hp.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <7h8ufn8c8q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7h8ufn8c8q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring , Abhilash Kesavan , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , Catalin Marinas , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Viswanath Puttagunta , Stephen Boyd , santosh shilimkar , Rafael Wysocki , "olof@lixom.net" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , Mike Turquette , Sudeep Holla , Grant Likely , Thomas Petazzoni , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Lucas Stach List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 24 February 2015 10:42 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Viresh Kumar writes: > s/they share clock lines/they share clock and/or voltage lines/ Hmm, will update that. > OK, fair enough. Looks like it's been thought through. > > However, in the end, I don't think it's going to avoid the "help of some > algorithms." The flag will tell you it's shared, but not how, and that > will likely still need to be determined. What did you mean by 'how' here? You wanted to say which devices share the OPP? Yeah, a small piece of code is required and that's present in my patchset.