From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] (gpio-fan): Add thermal control hooks Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:32:32 -0800 Message-ID: <54F5F030.3020200@roeck-us.net> References: <1420740303-12529-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <54AF5DA8.6080408@roeck-us.net> <20150224192933.GJ3448@developer.amazonguestwifi.org> <20150224195457.GA16245@roeck-us.net> <54F5EAC8.6040909@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54F5EAC8.6040909@ti.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Eduardo Valentin , Jean Delvare , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, lkml , dt list , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/03/2015 09:09 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 02/24/2015 02:06 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:29:35PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>>> Guenter, >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:48:40PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>> On 01/08/2015 10:05 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>>>> Allow gpio-fan to be used as thermal cooling device for platforms that >>>>>> use GPIO maps to control fans. >>>>>> >>>>>> As part of this change, we make the shutdown and remove logic the same >>>>>> as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon >>>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Applied to -next. >>>> >>>> What is the target kernel version for this change? It didn't make >>>> 4.0-rc1 >>>> >>> If I recall correctly, I had to pull it because the thermal framework >>> does not provide hooks if disabled. Weird, I am sure I sent an e-mail >>> about this, but I don't find it right now. >>> >>> It can't make it in before the hooks are in place, or we'll need >>> another version with ifdefs around the thermal registration code. >> >> I had posted the required hooks. >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5828261/ -> I think Eduardo picked >> this one up.. So once it hits mainline, we should ideally be clear. >> > merged as 12ca7188468ee29c4e717f73db4bf43c90954fc7 upstream. Can we > pick up this patch now? > Done, currently testing. Should make its way into -next in a couple of days unless there are unexpected problems. Guenter