devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@mediatek.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	yh.chen@mediatek.com, yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:19:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5502C7C8.1020002@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426242563.18291.19.camel@mtksdaap41>



On 13/03/15 11:29, Eddie Huang wrote:
> 
> I encounter some trouble when I add code to check return value of
> regmap_read and regmap_write. Every RTC register access through regmap,
> and there are many register read/write in this driver. If I check every
> return value, the driver will become ugly. I try to make this driver
> clean using following macro.
> 
> static int __rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 *data)
> {
>         u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
> 
>         if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
>                 return regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
> 
>         return -EINVAL;
> }
> 
> #define rtc_read(ret, rtc, offset, data)                \
> ({                                                      \
>         ret = __rtc_read(rtc, offset, data);            \
>         if (ret < 0)                                    \
>                 goto rtc_exit;                          \
> })                                                      \
> 

I agree with Sascha on hiding a goto statement in a macro is not a good idea.

> 
> And function call rtc_read, rtc_write looks like:
> 
> static int mtk_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> {
>         unsigned long time;
>         struct mt6397_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>         int ret = 0;
>         u32 sec;
> 
>         mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
>         do {
>                 rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &tm->tm_sec);
>                 rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MIN, &tm->tm_min);
>                 rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_HOU, &tm->tm_hour);
>                 rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_DOM, &tm->tm_mday);
>                 rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_MTH, &tm->tm_mon);
>                 rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_YEA, &tm->tm_year);
>                 rtc_read(ret, rtc, RTC_TC_SEC, &sec);
>         } while (sec < tm->tm_sec);

What about introducing
static int __mtk_rtc_read_time(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm, u32 *sec)
and hide the checks of return values from regmap_read and the offset check in there. You return the error code or 0.

This way the while loop would look like this:

do {
	ret = __mtk_rtc_read_time(rtc, &tm, &sec);
	if (ret < 0)
		goto rtc_exit;
} while (sec < tm->tm_sec);

Best regards,
Matthias

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-13 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-28  9:27 [PATCH 0/2] Add Mediatek RTC driver Eddie Huang
2015-01-28  9:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt: bindings: Add Mediatek RTC driver binding document Eddie Huang
2015-01-28  9:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver Eddie Huang
2015-02-23 21:50   ` [rtc-linux] " Andrew Morton
2015-03-02  8:20     ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-02 19:35       ` Andrew Morton
2015-03-13 10:29     ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-13 10:57       ` Sascha Hauer
     [not found]         ` <20150313105742.GS24885-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-16  9:52           ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-13 11:19       ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2015-03-16 15:30   ` Uwe Kleine-König
     [not found]     ` <20150316153048.GC10068-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-17 12:31       ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-17 13:43         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-03-18  3:27           ` Eddie Huang
2015-03-18  7:42             ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5502C7C8.1020002@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tianping.fang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yh.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).