From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:26:59 +0100 Message-ID: <55035623.8010002@linaro.org> References: <1425385777-14766-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <5501A1DE.9020804@linaro.org> <20150313182908.GU30671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150313182908.GU30671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lina.iyer@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/13/2015 07:29 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> do you agree with this patchset ? > > In principle yes, apart from some function naming and I'm waiting for > Lorenzo's ack as well. Do you plan to upstream this directly via your > tree? If yes, I'll look in more detail and give some acks. If you don't care, I would like to upstream via my tree because there i= s=20 a couple of operations (like sharing a branch) I would like to monitor=20 to let people build their driver on top of it: renesas and qcom. Qcom's cpuidle driver is already implemented and waits for this patchse= t=20 to be upstream (the patchset has been around long enough). And I believ= e=20 the Renesas driver will be reworked to use it also. --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog