From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-utgard: add optional supply regulator Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:12:24 +0200 Message-ID: <5517832.4TA9c0NYD6@diego> References: <20170905105739.8330-1-heiko@sntech.de> <20170905105739.8330-3-heiko@sntech.de> <20170912220920.nfg33wbqikja3gml@rob-hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170912220920.nfg33wbqikja3gml@rob-hp-laptop> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring Cc: linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Rob, Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 17:09:20 CEST schrieb Rob Herring: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 12:57:34PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Mali GPUs have a separate supplying regulator in a lot of socs, > > so describe a mali-supply property. The already described > > operating points will likely also need access to this regulator. > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt index > > 3b7f6f72f032..bcaa640c883f 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt > > > > @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ Optional properties: > > Memory region to allocate from, as defined in > > Documentation/devicetree/bindi/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt > > > > + - mali-supply : Phandle to regulator for the Mali device. Refer to > > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt for > > details. > > Wouldn't a power domain be more appropriate? At least on Rockchip socs there is a power-domain, but also the separate additional regulator. See the similar mali-midgard binding. Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html