From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: Update the device trees for 2836. Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:36:05 -0600 Message-ID: <5539C835.1000109@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1429639796-2169-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net> <1429639796-2169-5-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1429639796-2169-5-git-send-email-eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Eric Anholt Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-rpi-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Lee Jones , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 04/21/2015 12:09 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: > The bus address for peripherals comes from the platform.h diff between > 2708 and 2709, and the CPU's DT definition is based on the 2709 DT. I would suggest squashing this with the previous commit. I was puzzled why patch 3 added bcm2836-rpi.dtsi, yet in that patch, bcm2836-rpi-2-b.dts included bcm2835-rpi.dtsi instead. git should still show that patch as a copy+edit assuming the files are similar enough. > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2836.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2836.dtsi > + __overrides__ { > + arm_freq = <&v7_cpu0>, "clock-frequency:0"; > + }; > }; We don't have any DT override/overlay/... support in the bcm2835 files yet. Does it make sense not to only add it to bcm2836 files when we add the equivalent everywhere? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html