From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans-Oq418RWZeHk@public.gmane.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: DT: Allow to specify that no write protect signal is present
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 11:04:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554887B0.4020407@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpC9uc0n8HLiC1gWgdJOM-0DGVaNazkF3Q847r-sfXNtg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 05/05/2015 10:36 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> index 438899e..b068549 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Optional properties:
>> below for the case, when a GPIO is used for the CD line
>> - wp-inverted: when present, polarity on the WP line is inverted. See the note
>> below for the case, when a GPIO is used for the WP line
>> +- disable-wp: When set no physical WP line is present
>
> This requires some additional explanation, I believe. I assume this
> property is only relevant for those controllers that have internal
> logic to handle WP!?
Yes, currently drivers for controllers that have a built-in WP detection
logic typically assume that if no WP GPIO is specified the built-in WP logic
should be used. But for some of them the value returned by the internal
detection logic will be bogus if there is no WP signal connected. So we need
a way to specify that that there is no WP signal and the internal detection
logic shouldn't be used either.
>
> For those that uses GPIO, this can't ever be a correct configuration. Right?
It wouldn't make much sense to use it with a GPIO based detection logic,
since you simply don't specify the wp-gpio property if it is not present.
One the other hand it wouldn't cause any harm to specify it in addition to
not specifying the wp-gpios property.
How about:
- disable-wp: When set no physical WP line is present. This property should
only be specified when the controller has a dedicated write-protect
detection logic. If a GPIO is used for write-protect detection logic is used
it is sufficient to not specify wp-gpios property in the absence of a WP line.
[...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 9:40 [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci: Add quirk to disable write-protect detection Lars-Peter Clausen
[not found] ` <1430214020-16816-1-git-send-email-lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-28 9:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: DT: Allow to specify that no write protect signal is present Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-05-05 8:36 ` Ulf Hansson
[not found] ` <CAPDyKFpC9uc0n8HLiC1gWgdJOM-0DGVaNazkF3Q847r-sfXNtg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-05 9:04 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2015-05-05 10:15 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554887B0.4020407@metafoo.de \
--to=lars-qo5elluwu/uelga04laivw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mike.looijmans-Oq418RWZeHk@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).