Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] ARM: bcm2835: Add the Raspberry Pi firmware driver

["Noralf Trønnes" <noralf-L59+Z2yzLopAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>]

Den 13.05.2015 21:00, skrev Eric Anholt:
> This gives us a function for making mailbox property channel requests
> of the firmware, which is most notable in that it will let us get and
> set clock rates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
> ---

[...]

> +/*
> + * Submits a single tag to the VPU firmware through the mailbox
> + * property interface.
> + *
> + * This is a convenience wrapper around
> + * rpi_firmware_property_list() to avoid some of the
> + * boilerplate in property calls.
> + */
> +int rpi_firmware_property(struct device_node *of_node,
> +			  u32 tag, void *tag_data, size_t buf_size)

To use the firmware property functions, I need a DT node pointer.
Since Device Tree is dynamic now, should I fetch the firmware node
each time, or should I do that in probe and store the node pointer?

Device Tree:
         firmware: firmware {
             compatible = "raspberrypi,firmware";
         };

         thermal {
             compatible = "brcm,bcm2835-thermal";
             firmware = <&firmware>;
         };

Rewritten (not tested) function from downstream bcm2835-thermal driver:

static int bcm2835_get_temp_or_max(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_dev,
                                    unsigned long *temp, unsigned tag_id)
{
     struct device *dev = <get device somehow>;
     struct device_node *np;
     struct {
         u32 id;
         u32 val;
     } tag_buf;

     np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "firmware", 0);
     if (!np)
         return -EINVAL;

     ret = rpi_firmware_property(np, tag_id, &tag_buf, sizeof(tag_buf));
     if (ret)
         return ret;

     *temp = val;

     return 0;
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html