From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaibhav Hiremath Subject: Re: [PATCH-v4 2/3] mfd: 88pm800: Set default interrupt clear method Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:01:28 +0530 Message-ID: <558C1ED0.4010408@linaro.org> References: <1435217189-19578-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1435217189-19578-3-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150625102618.GC15013@x1> <558BE3D6.2010801@linaro.org> <20150625144627.GB23990@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150625144627.GB23990@x1> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, yizhang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, Zhao Ye List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 25 June 2015 08:16 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >> On Thursday 25 June 2015 03:56 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>> >>>> As per the spec, bit 1 (INT_CLEAR_MODE) of reg addr 0xe >>>> (page 0) controls the method of clearing interrupt >>>> status of 88pm800 family of devices; >>>> >>>> 0: clear on read >>>> 1: clear on write >>>> >>>> If pdata is not coming from board file, then set the >>>> default irq clear method to "irq clear on write" >>>> >>>> Also, as suggested by "Lee Jones" renaming variable field >>>> to appropriate name. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Ye >>>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >>>> --- >>>> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >>>> include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h | 6 ++++-- >>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>> index 40fd014..e0cd7ad 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c > > [...] > >>>> + PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR : PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR; >>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, irq_clr_mode); >>>> >>>> if (ret < 0) >>>> goto out; >>>> @@ -514,6 +515,7 @@ static int device_800_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip, >>>> } >>>> >>>> chip->regmap_irq_chip = &pm800_irq_chip; >>>> + chip->irq_clr_on_wr = pdata->irq_clr_on_wr; >>> >>> You have protection around pdata everywhere else in the file, I >>> suggest you supply some here too. >>> >> >> Actually it is not really needed, as the PATCH 1/1 introduces >> >> >> if (!pdata && !np) { >> dev_err(&client->dev, >> "pm80x requires platform data or of_node\n"); >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> >> if (!pdata && !np) { >> dev_err(&client->dev, >> "pm80x requires platform data or of_node\n"); >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> >> >> So there is no way you can have pdata = NULL beyond this point. > > I saw that. I want you to remove that too. > You mean, remove existing protection in the driver? I will create a separate patch for this. > [...] > >>>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h >>>> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ enum { >>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2 (0x0E) >>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INV_INT (1 << 0) >>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_CLEAR (1 << 1) >>>> +#define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR (0 << 1) >>>> +#define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR (1 << 1) >>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_MASK (1 << 2) >>> >>> Use the BIT() macro. >>> >> >> I thought about this, but the whole file doesn't use it, so I also >> chose not to. > > Then the whole file needs moving over. > > Patches accepted. > Will change the driver and submit the patch. >>>> #define PM800_POWER_UP_LOG (0x10) >>>> @@ -300,7 +302,7 @@ struct pm80x_chip { >>>> struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data; >>>> int type; >>>> int irq; >>>> - int irq_mode; >>>> + int irq_clr_on_wr; /* '1': Clear on write, '0': Clear on read*/ >>> >>> Whitespace issue. >> >> Didn't see any...and I also ran checkpatch. > > You have no space before the '*/'. > >>> Shouldn't this be a bool? >>> >> >> Just was not sure about any older board file interface. >> Ideally it should be bool only. > > Right. > >>> Actually even better, I would define; CLR_ON_WRITE and CLR_ON_READ, >>> and call the variable irq_clear_method, or something. >>> >>> Much clearer that way I think. >>> >> >> We have slowly decided to almost hardcode it to one value if there is >> no board file. I feel we should just keep it to simple. >> >> If you still insist, I can implement. > > I like clarity and by your own admission (by warranting an additional > comment) it's not clear. Please make it as clear as you can. > OK, will change the code for CLEAR_ON_READ and CLEAR_ON_WRITE. Thanks, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html