From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaibhav Hiremath Subject: Re: [PATCH-v5 RESEND 0/5] i2c: pxa: Add support for PXA910 family of device Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:17:42 +0530 Message-ID: <55E69B8E.8040704@linaro.org> References: <1440395978-9065-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1440395978-9065-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, robert.jarzmik-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday 24 August 2015 11:29 AM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > Sorry for not following up on this aggressively, was quit busy with some > other stuff. Resending this patch with Robert's Tested-By. > > > This patch-series is subset of the original patch-series, submitted > on 14 Jul 2015. > Link to Original Patch-series - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/14/80 > > The first six patches have been already queued up for upstream. So this > patch-series is respin of remaining 5 patches. > > Testing: > - Basic testing on PMIC device on I2C-0 interface > - Boot tested on platform based on PXA1928 > - Read few registers of PMIC (RTC, ID, etc...) during boot > > V4 => V5 > ======= > Link to V3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/14/80 > - Dropped First 6 patches as they are already accepted, queued for upstream > - Fixed a bug in PATCH [5/5], where for non PXA910 devices it as resulting into > NULL pointer dereference. > > Any update on this? This series is waiting since long time now. Wolfram, I know you wanted to have more discussion on DT properties & changes. And I would be more happy to discuss. Thanks, Vaibhav