From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Brugger Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 19:23:03 +0200 Message-ID: <55E73077.8060106@gmail.com> References: <1439803465-19683-1-git-send-email-pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org> <20150826021659.GD8784@linux> <22538895.vrRgZUmQTV@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Kurtz Cc: Pi-Cheng Chen , Viresh Kumar , Mark Rutland , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Michael Turquette , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 02/09/15 08:45, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > Matthias, > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 02:53:39 PM Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>>> On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: >>>>> The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the patch which >>>>> introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver. So it will >>>>> cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure how this >>>>> should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC maintainer >>>>> tree? >>>> >>>> Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on >>>> rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq >>>> wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees are >>>> merged by Linus. >>> >>> Thanks for your explanation. >>> >>> @Rafael, Would you please apply [1,2] to your tree? >> >> Applied, thanks! > > Can you please apply [3] from this set to your dts tree? > I will as soon as v4.3-rc1 shows up.