From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Popov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dmaengine: mpc512x: initialize with subsys_initcall() Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 00:31:34 +0300 Message-ID: <56158F36.1080602@linux.com> References: <1443115737-3948-1-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com> <1443115737-3948-4-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com> <20151007141740.GF3320@vkoul-mobl.iind.intel.com> Reply-To: alex.popov@linux.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151007141740.GF3320@vkoul-mobl.iind.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Anatolij Gustschin , Gerhard Sittig , Rob Herring , Timur Tabi , Grant Likely , Dan Williams , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Popov List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07.10.2015 17:17, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:28:57PM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote: >> Initialize Freescale MPC512x DMA driver with subsys_initcall() >> to allow the depending drivers to call dma_request_slave_channel() >> during their probe. > > Why can't we use defered probe ? I have been asking people to not move init > levels and esnure we have right solutions using defered probe Thanks, Vinod, I'll do it in v4. Best regards, Alexander