From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 resend 0/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: q8 A13 tablet backlight support Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:49:39 +0200 Message-ID: <561A30B3.8060106@redhat.com> References: <1443522591-6590-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20151001203331.GP7104@lukather> Reply-To: hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151001203331.GP7104@lukather> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 01-10-15 22:33, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:29:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi Maxime, >> >> This series seems to have fallen through the cracks, hence this >> resend. > > No, it didn't fall through the cracks, I asked a question on the first > patch and never got a reply. > > The way we handled *all* the controllers so far is that the compatible > was representing what the controllers what features the controller was > exposing. This is the case for the clocks or pinctrl for example. > > We should be consistent with that (beside the fact that using a > compatible from a later SoC is wrong). Ah ok, I somehow missed that reply, a pwm patch to add the compatibles + v3 of the dts patches is coming up. Regards, Hans