From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for mic detection Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:16:54 +0900 Message-ID: <561B8896.7040409@samsung.com> References: <1443803363-3251-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1443803363-3251-5-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20151007100017.GB12635@sirena.org.uk> <20151007122642.GH17172@x1> <20151012084554.GB8805@ck-lbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-reply-to: <20151012084554.GB8805@ck-lbox> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Charles Keepax , Lee Jones Cc: Mark Brown , robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Charles, On 2015=EB=85=84 10=EC=9B=94 12=EC=9D=BC 17:45, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: >>>> Add additional bindings to allow configuration of the system speci= fic >>>> microphone detection settings. >>> >>> This all seems pretty much fine to me - the things it is controllin= g are >>> fairly specific to the way the former Wolfson devices do, they only >>> really make sense with a fairly particular algorithm which isn't wi= dely >>> implemented. >> >> Is that an Ack? >=20 > I am guessing Mark is slightly hesitant to ack as he probably > doesn't want to add reviewing all our jack detection bindings to > his already fairly sizable work load and doing so here likely > means it will be expected in the future. From talking to people at > LinuxCon it looks like it is pretty unlikely the DT maintainers > will be acking individual bindings as well, basically they are > only really looking at major/framework things and leaving the > rest to subsystem maintainers. >=20 > Given that these patches only touch MFD/Extcon and extcon > is a subsystem designed to handle things like jack detection > isn't it really sufficient that you and Chanwoo have looked this > and are happy with it? Otherwise I really don't see anyway to > move this forward and would appreciate any suggestions? I'm positive about your patches. After receiving the ack from MFD maint= ainer I want to apply this patch-set on extcon git repository. Also, I reviewed this patch on previous patch[1]. [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/11/81 Thanks, Chanwoo Choi