From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: sunxi: Fix interrupt-cells for [r]pio on A23/A31/A33/A80 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:55:47 +0200 Message-ID: <561FBE73.7070606@redhat.com> References: <1444919327-23747-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <5423411.WHZ4SNGvxb@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5423411.WHZ4SNGvxb@wuerfel> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linus Walleij , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Thomas Kaiser , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 15-10-15 16:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 15 October 2015 16:28:45 Hans de Goede wrote: >> When the gpio interrupt bindings where changed to add a bank to the >> specifier list, the r_pio nodes of A23/A31/A33 where not updated to >> match and neither was the pio node of the A80, this fixes this. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede >> > > Is this safe to apply by itself? I don't see any interrupts references > to these nodes, so I assume it's fine, but if there are any cross-dependencies > we need more careful planning. Should be safe to apply by itself, later patches in this series introduce the first interrupt users of these nodes, which is what made me notice the mistake in them. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html