From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5250: Add DISP1 clocks Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 08:41:33 +0900 Message-ID: <56218B2D.9040007@kernel.org> References: <1444905084-22540-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <1444905084-22540-2-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <56203AD3.2050905@samsung.com> <20151016124935.20687.4394@quantum> <20151016172651.GB23912@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomeu Vizoso Cc: Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Gustavo Padovan , Javier Martinez Canillas , Seung-Woo Kim , Kukjin Kim , Inki Dae , Kyungmin Park , Joonyoung Shim , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kumar Gala , Ian Campbell , linux-samsung-soc , Sylwester Nawrocki , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Tomasz Figa , linux-clk@vger List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/15 03:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 16 October 2015 at 19:26, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 10/16, Michael Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2015-10-15 16:46:27) >>>> On 15.10.2015 19:31, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>>> When the DISP1 power domain is powered off, there's two clocks that need >>>>> to be temporarily reparented to OSC, and back to their original parents >>>>> when the domain is powered on again. >>>>> >>>>> We expose these two clocks in the DT bindings so that the DT node of the >>>>> power domain can reference them. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso >>>>> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v2: >>>>> - Reuse mout_aclk200_p >>>>> - Rename div_aclk300 as div_aclk300_disp >>>>> >>>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h | 4 +++- >>>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>> >>> Applied to clk-next. >>> >> >> I think Tomeu wanted to take this through arm-soc? Otherwise >> we'll need to provide a stable branch for the dt header. > > Hi, Stephen is right, the second patch depends on this one. > So...how can I take 2nd patch of this series in samsung(arm-soc) tree? And this series shouldn't be for fixes for 4.3?...Mike how do you think? Thanks, Kukjin