From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:26:12 -0600 Message-ID: <5638C404.1020805@codeaurora.org> References: <1446174501-8870-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <9016417.z9Hz6MbmvQ@wuerfel> <56383BDD.9090903@codeaurora.org> <4010471.Nu3L6CWPWG@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4010471.Nu3L6CWPWG@wuerfel> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sinan Kaya Cc: Arnd Bergmann , dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cov-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, jcm-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Vinod Koul , Dan Williams , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Arnd Bergmann wrote: > If you change the order in the Makefile, the management driver should > always get probed first if both are built-in. When the driver is a > loadable module, the ordering should work because of the way that the > modules are loaded. This sounds like something that should be commented in the Makefile. Even if you use -EPROBE_DEFER and you re-order the Makefile only so that it's less likely to be a problem, that's still worthy of a comment. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html