From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 17:07:41 +0900 Message-ID: <563B0E4D.6020808@samsung.com> References: <5639B588.1080901@samsung.com> <000b01d1179f$ed5032b0$c7f09810$@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <000b01d1179f$ed5032b0$c7f09810$@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Fedin , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: 'Rob Herring' , 'Pawel Moll' , 'Mark Rutland' , 'Ian Campbell' , 'Kumar Gala' , 'Kukjin Kim' List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05.11.2015 16:59, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by >>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set: >>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html >> >> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback >> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest... > > I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. Where can > i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and include > into my set. Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed). Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper. Best regards, Krzysztof