From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: dts: Add Ethernet chip to SMDK5410
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:27:17 +0900
Message-ID: <563B3D15.2070700@samsung.com>
References: <cover.1446542020.git.p.fedin@samsung.com>
 <4568ad982f0af1846994119961cbb798edff311c.1446542020.git.p.fedin@samsung.com>
 <5639C1A5.1040708@samsung.com> <004f01d117bb$1e4fbb40$5aef31c0$@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <004f01d117bb$1e4fbb40$5aef31c0$@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com, 'Rob Herring' <robh+dt@kernel.org>, 'Pawel Moll' <pawel.moll@arm.com>, 'Mark Rutland' <mark.rutland@arm.com>, 'Ian Campbell' <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, 'Kumar Gala' <galak@codeaurora.org>, 'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@kernel.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

W dniu 05.11.2015 o 20:14, Pavel Fedin pisze:
>  Hello!
> 
>>> +	ethernet@3 {
>>> +		compatible = "smsc,lan9115";
>>> +		reg = <3 0 0x10000>;
>>> +		phy-mode = "mii";
>>> +		interrupt-parent = <&gpx0>;
>>> +		interrupts = <5 8>;
>>
>> s/8/IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW/
>> (is this really level low interrupt?)
> 
>  Yes, according to: https://github.com/AndreiLux/Perseus-S3/blob/master/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk5250.c#L133

Although this is different board, but okay.

> 
>> Some other DTS include regulators: vddvario-supply and vdd33a-supply. It
>> seems that they are not described in SMSC911x bindings but in
>> GPMC-eth... but the smsc911x driver is requesting them. Could you
>> investigate that? I think these regulators should be provided (and
>> SMSC911x bindings should be updated).
> 
>  Sorry, i cannot. The board has lots of jumpers, which choose between fixed voltage and regulators for different components,
> according to board's manual, but the manual is very poor IMHO, and i don't understand how to use them. And i use default,
> fixed-voltage configuration.
>  One of my colleagues tried to get it working, but failed. It actually requires more time, and IIRC you need to bring up i2c before
> you can drive regulators.
>  So can we leave it as it is for now? At least it works, and this is much better than no ethernet support at all.

Ok, that is sufficient explanation.

>> I don't have the board schematics so I couldn't verify the GPIOs.
> 
>  Me neither, i wrote GPIO settings according to chip datasheet i have. They are actually chip-specific, but i wrote them in board
> file because on different boards you may use different banks, and therefore different pins. Or, if you don't use SROMc at all, you
> can configure all pins to do something else.
> 

Makes sense.

Best regards,
Krzysztof