From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olliver Schinagl Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] pwm: core: use bitops Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:49:25 +0100 Message-ID: <563CBDF5.50904@ultimaker.com> References: <1445895161-2317-1-git-send-email-o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> <1445895161-2317-5-git-send-email-o.schinagl@ultimaker.com> <20151106144635.GA8418@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151106144635.GA8418@ulmo> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Olliver Schinagl , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Joachim Eastwood , Maxime Ripard , Alexandre Belloni , Olliver Schinagl , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hey Thierry, but why have the bit macro at all then :) But that choice I guess I leave to you, as it's your section, I know=20 some submaintainers prefer it and want it to be used, so I guess it's=20 something in general kernel wide that should be desided on, BIT() macro= =20 preferred or not. Olliver On 06-11-15 15:46, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32:35PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: >> From: Olliver Schinagl >> >> The pwm header defines bits manually while there is a nice bitops.h = with >> a BIT() macro. Use the BIT() macro to set bits in pwm.h >> >> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl >> --- >> include/linux/pwm.h | 7 ++++--- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > I don't think this is a useful change. The BIT() macro needs the same > number of characters to type at the expense of requiring an additiona= l > include. > > Thierry --=20 Met vriendelijke groeten, Kind regards, =E4=B8=8E=E4=BA=B2=E5=88=87=E7=9A= =84=E9=97=AE=E5=80=99 Olliver Schinagl Software Engineer Research & Development Ultimaker B.V.