From: Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@imgtec.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>,
linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Alex Smith <alex@alex-smith.me.uk>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7,3/3] MIPS: dts: jz4780/ci20: Add NEMC, BCH and NAND device tree nodes
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:29:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564B55D7.5050209@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151104085130.3981ac63@bbrezillon>
Hi Boris,
On 04/11/15 07:51, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Paul, Harvey,
>
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:48:48 +0100
> Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:31:12AM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +&nemc {
>>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + nand: nand@1 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nand";
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't the NAND a micron part? This doesn't seem right. Is the device
>>>>> driver and binding already accepted upstream with that compatible
>>>>> string?
>>>>
>>>> This is the compatible string for the JZ4780 NAND driver, this patch
>>>> is part of the series adding that. Detection of the NAND part is
>>>> handled by the MTD subsystem.
>>>
>>> Right (didn't spot that it was part of a series).
>>>
>>> The node appears to describe the NAND interface itself, i.e. a part of
>>> the SoC, so should be in the SoC dtsi file, with overrides in the board
>>> file if necessary for it to work with a particular NAND part
>>> (potentially utilising status="disabled"). Would you agree?
>>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> The "nemc" node there is for the Nand & External Memory Controller which
>> is a hardware block inside the SoC. It has 6 banks (ie. 6 chip select
>> pins, each associated with a different address range, that connect to
>> different devices). NAND flash is one such possible device, but a board
>> could connect it to any of the 6 chip selects, or banks. To represent
>> that in the SoC dtsi you'd want to have 6 NAND nodes, each disabled by
>> default, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Other, non-NAND
>> devices can connect to the NEMC too - for example the ethernet
>> controller on the CI20 is connected to one bank.
>>
>> The NAND device nodes are sort of a mix of describing the NAND flash
>> (ie. Micron part as you point out) and its connections & properties, the
>> way the NEMC should be used to interact with it alongside the BCH block,
>> and the configuration for the NEMC such as timing parameters.
>>
>> I imagine the most semantically correct means of describing it would
>> probably be for the compatible string to reflect the Micron NAND part,
>> and the NEMC driver to pick up on the relevant properties of its child
>> nodes for configuring timings, whether the device is NAND etc. However
>> the handling of registering NAND devices with MTD would probably then
>> have to be part of the NEMC driver, which feels a bit off too.
>
> Another solution would be to describe both the NAND controller and the
> NAND chip in the DT (with the NAND chip being a chip of the NAND
> controller).
> Actually this is already what other binding are doing [1][2]. I know
> those bindings are representing NAND controllers which can interface
> with more than one NAND chip, but I think that even in the 1:1 case it
> would make it clearer to represent both the NAND chip and the NAND
> controller.
>
> In your case this would give the following representation
>
> +&nemc {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + nandc: nand-controller@1 {
> + compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nand";
> + reg = <1 0 0x1000000>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + ingenic,bch-controller = <&bch>;
> +
> + nand@0 {
> + nand-ecc-mode = "hw";
> + nand-on-flash-bbt;
> + nand-ecc-size = <1024>;
> + nand-ecc-strength = <24>;
> +
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + partition@0 {
> + label = "u-boot-spl";
> + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x800000>;
> + };
> + /* ... */
> +
> + };
> + };
> +};
I'll implement this in v8 - thanks for the example DT. :-)
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt#L119
> [2]http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/sunxi-nand.txt#L28
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
>
>
Best regards,
Harvey Hunt
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1444148837-10770-1-git-send-email-harvey.hunt@imgtec.com>
[not found] ` <1444148837-10770-1-git-send-email-harvey.hunt-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v7,1/3] dt-bindings: binding for jz4780-{nand,bch} Harvey Hunt
2015-11-04 7:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-11-17 16:08 ` Harvey Hunt
2015-11-17 16:25 ` Harvey Hunt
2015-10-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v7,3/3] MIPS: dts: jz4780/ci20: Add NEMC, BCH and NAND device tree nodes Harvey Hunt
2015-10-08 21:22 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-10-14 9:15 ` Harvey Hunt
[not found] ` <1444148837-10770-4-git-send-email-harvey.hunt-1AXoQHu6uovQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-15 8:47 ` James Hogan
[not found] ` <20151015084727.GG14475-4bYivNCBEGTR3KXKvIWQxtm+Uo4AYnCiHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-16 10:11 ` Alex Smith
[not found] ` <CAOFt0_D5mO-7_cnpvm_MwvsZNv1yCFynbeA3dSw=H5hVyQbgTA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-16 10:31 ` James Hogan
2015-10-16 10:48 ` Paul Burton
2015-11-04 7:51 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-11-17 16:29 ` Harvey Hunt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564B55D7.5050209@imgtec.com \
--to=harvey.hunt@imgtec.com \
--cc=Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com \
--cc=alex.smith@imgtec.com \
--cc=alex@alex-smith.me.uk \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).