From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ding Tianhong Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] arm64: arch_timer: Add workaround for hisilicon-161010101 erratum Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:36:41 +0800 Message-ID: <56554f95-b51d-abc7-8ac0-7f561728375a@huawei.com> References: <1484832916-7248-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> <20170120150428.GC22152@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170120150428.GC22152@leverpostej> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Rutland , catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, stuart.yoder-3arQi8VN3Tc@public.gmane.org, linuxarm-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, oss-fOR+EgIDQEHk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org, shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2017/1/20 23:04, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:35:12PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> Ding Tianhong (4): >> arm64: arch_timer: Add device tree binding for hisilicon-161010101 >> erratum >> arm64: arch_timer: Introduce a generic erratum handing mechanism for >> fsl-a008585 >> arm64: arch_timer: Work around Erratum Hisilicon-161010101 >> arm64: arch timer: Add timer erratum property for Hip05-d02 and >> Hip06-d03 >> >> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 -- >> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 43 +++--- >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 6 + >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip05.dtsi | 1 + >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip06.dtsi | 1 + >> arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 38 ++---- >> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 18 +++ >> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 150 +++++++++++++++------ >> 8 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-) > > I've picked these up (with a few local cleanups), given that some local > testing, and pushed the result to a branch [1] on my git repo. > > There are likely to be clashes with the arm64 tree (e.g. for > silicon-errata.txt), and we're also likely to have more arch timer > updates shortly for the GTDT stuff, so I think the best bet is for both > arm64 and the clocksource tree to pull that branch for v4.11. > > Alternatively, we could take this all through the arm64 tree, if the > clocksource maintainers are happy with that. > > Thoughts? > Hi Mark: It is really a great milestone now, Thanks for the help, and I will still wait for Marc's new opinion for this version, hoping no need to change anything else. :) Thanks Ding > Thanks, > Mark. > > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arch-timer/hisi-161010101 > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html