From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/19] ARM: dts: imx: replace legacy *,wakeup property with wakeup-source Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:05:24 +0000 Message-ID: <565EC264.80902@arm.com> References: <1445422216-29375-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1445422216-29375-12-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20151123053705.GH13744@tiger> <5656EE1E.2030104@arm.com> <20151202015400.GB692@tiger> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151202015400.GB692@tiger> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: Sudeep Holla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 02/12/15 01:54, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:33:50AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> >> On 23/11/15 05:37, Shawn Guo wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:10:08AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>>> Though the keyboard and other driver will continue to support the legacy >>>> "gpio-key,wakeup", "linux,wakeup" boolean property to enable the wakeup >>>> source, "wakeup-source" is the new standard binding. >>>> >>>> This patch replaces all the legacy wakeup properties with the unified >>>> "wakeup-source" property in order to avoid any futher copy-paste >>>> duplication. >>>> >>>> Cc: Shawn Guo >>>> Cc: Sascha Hauer >>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla >>> >>> >>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-digi-connectcore-som.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-digi-connectcore-som.dtsi >>>> index 321662f53e33..16fc69c69ab2 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-digi-connectcore-som.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-digi-connectcore-som.dtsi >>>> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ >>>> pinctrl-names = "default"; >>>> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_esdhc2>; >>>> cap-sdio-irq; >>>> - enable-sdio-wakeup; >>>> + wakeup-source; >>> >>> I do not see this be mentioned in commit log. I do not see relevant >>> kernel changes in v4.4-rc1 to support that. Am I missing anything? >>> >> >> Sorry for that, you weren't copied on that patch[1], Ulf has queued it >> now [2] > > My branch is based on v4.4-rc1 which doesn't have that patch. That > said, I can not apply it for now. > Ah OK, that's fine pick it up when appropriate. I just wanted to let you know that dependent patch is already queued. -- Regards, Sudeep