From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 PART-RESEND 0/2] berlin sdhci clock clean up Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 11:07:41 +0100 Message-ID: <566408ED.9040902@gmail.com> References: <1447671395-8023-1-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com> <564E3191.8060109@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <564E3191.8060109@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jisheng Zhang , robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Turquette , Stephen Rothwell List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 19.11.2015 21:31, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 16.11.2015 11:56, Jisheng Zhang wrote: >> Add or fix the optional clock property, then remove the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED >> flag for sdio clk(s). >> >> This is a partialy resend of >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/379457.html >> >> patch3, patch4 has been merged. > > Great! Really! > > As they have been taken without my Acked-by, ignoring my request to > _not_ remove the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flags _before_ these two, the > remaining patches now become fixes. > > Please resend the patches with a proper description what and why they > are fixes now. Is this going to be resolved anytime soon? If not, I am going to send a revert for the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED patch and we start this from the beginning. Sebastian