From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Make fifo watermark and maxburst settings device tree options Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:31:19 -0600 Message-ID: <56984BE7.2050303@tabi.org> References: <1452788982-11583-1-git-send-email-caleb@crome.org> <20160114201858.GA17567@Asurada-Nvidia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160114201858.GA17567@Asurada-Nvidia> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolin Chen , Caleb Crome Cc: Xiubo Li , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Nicolin Chen wrote: > I think DT maintainers may not give a consent towards these two > properties as they are not to describe the hardware but to hack > software configurations. (And it seems you haven't CCed them.) I admit it's a grey area, but the hardware doesn't work if you use the wrong value, and it is a fixed value per device. A p1022ds would use a different value than in in i.MX6, and once you pick a value, it's the same no matter which sample rate, buffer size, etc you choose.