From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] regulator: max77620: add regulator driver for
 max77620/max20024
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:34:14 +0530
Message-ID: <569DDFEE.4080307@nvidia.com>
References: <1452771166-13694-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1452771166-13694-6-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <569DC9AD.7000504@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <569DC9AD.7000504@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, gnurou@gmail.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, swarren@nvidia.com, treding@nvidia.com, Mallikarjun Kasoju <mkasoju@nvidia.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

Thanks for review.
Here is my view on the some of the review comment.

On Tuesday 19 January 2016 10:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14.01.2016 20:32, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int max77620_init_pmic(struct max77620_regulator *pmic, int id)
> +{
> This function seems to be used only from max77620_of_parse_cb(). I would
> find easier to read if this was located before definition of
> max77620_of_parse_cb(). Can you move it (or you had other idea of
> placing algorithm)?

I wanted to keep all local function on top which is used on this file 
and not the regulator ops.
Then implement regulator ops and then probe.
Let me see if I can do anything here.

>
>> +		     pmic->enable_power_mode[id]) {
>> +			ret = max77620_regulator_set_power_mode(
>> +					pmic, pmic->enable_power_mode[id], id);
> The 'pmic' argument should be after opening parenthesis, not at new line.

This is done for indenting alignment. I am using checkpatch --strict 
option and for this the next line should be on same column of first 
charcter after opening parenthesis.
To avoid this error, if we want to re-align the indenting for next line 
then left the line empty after "(".

+
+static int __init max77620_regulator_init(void)
+{
+	return platform_driver_register(&max77620_regulator_driver);
+}
+subsys_initcall(max77620_regulator_init);
+

> Does it have to be subsys_initcall? Any special requirements for
> ordering the drivers? Probe deferring is encouraged instead.
>
>


This is to make sure th regulators are ready before other driver get 
probed. This is basic need of some of driver and hence subsys_initcall.
I will move to module_init() as some of other PMIC driver (as3722) is in 
the module init and used in tegra platform so not seeing much issue on this.