From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] acpi: Fix proper return code for function acpi_gsi_to_irq Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:31:39 +0000 Message-ID: <56A72EEB.5040205@arm.com> References: <1453335459-3617-1-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <1453335459-3617-2-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Loc Ho , Borislav Petkov , Doug Thompson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tomasz Nowicki , Fu Wei , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown Cc: linux-edac , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "patches-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org" , Tuan Phan List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Loc, On 25/01/16 21:23, Loc Ho wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Loc Ho wrote: >> >> The function acpi_gsi_to_irq must return 0 on success as the caller >> ghes_probe expects an 0 for success. This change also matches x86 >> implementation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan >> Signed-off-by: Loc Ho > > > Any issue with this version? If not, can this be pulled into 4.5? How is that 4.5 material? Does it fix an observable bug or a regression from a previous? If not, then this is probably to be postponed until 4.6, together with the code that makes use of it. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html