Re: [PATCH v10 5/5] Watchdog: ARM SBSA Generic Watchdog half timeout panic support

[Timur Tabi <timur-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>]

Fu Wei wrote:
> sorry, are you saying : using pre-timeout instead of this half timeout?
>
> But even we have pre-timeout support, pre-timeout  == timeout / 2, it
> can not be configured without touch timeout.
>
> if you want pre-timeout  != timeout / 2, we have to modify WCV in the
> interrupt routine.
>   (because of the explicit watchdog refresh  mechanism)
>
> Could you let me know why we need pre-timeout  here ??:-)

What I meant was that if we had full-blown pre-timeout support in the 
watchdog layer, then you could use that to implement the 
panic-on-half-timeout feature.

When pre-timeout is implemented, will you modify the interrupt handler 
to use it?

>> >belong upstream.  But like I said, it's just my opinion, and I won't
>> >complain if I'm outvoted.
>   I think this debugging feature is the  purpose of the two-stage
> watchdog, if I understand correctly

Hmmm... that make sense.  I think maybe you should drop the Kconfig 
option, and just have "static bool panic_enabled = false;"  Also, then 
do this:

if (panic_enabled) {
	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, sbsa_gwdt_interrupt, 0,
			       pdev->name, gwdt);
	if (ret) {
		dev_err(dev, "unable to request IRQ %d\n", irq);
		return ret;
	}
}

That way, the interrupt handler is never registered if the command-line 
parameter is not specified.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html