From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Daney Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] MIPS: Add support for OCTEON cn78xx and cn73xx. Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:31:55 -0800 Message-ID: <56B3FB8B.1050001@gmail.com> References: <1454632974-7686-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <20160205012235.GF1620@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160205012235.GF1620-4/PLUo9XfK9owWHViPbQSXlKr5M7+etX9Sl0XMgJPXI@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Aaro Koskinen Cc: linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org, ralf-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, David Daney , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Thomas Gleixner List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 02/04/2016 05:22 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:42:47PM -0800, David Daney wrote: >> From: David Daney >> >> The OCTEON III cn78xx and cn73xx family of SoCs has some architectural >> differences from previous OCTEON processors. > > Did you test this series also on older OCTEONs? A lot of common files > seems to be modified, so it would be good to describe how it was tested. > Yes, I tried to be very careful not to break things that already work. Tested on: CN7890 -- OCTEON III CN7360 -- OCTEON III CN5750 -- OCTEON Plus In the case of CN5750, I booted a full Debian system from the on-board CF with no problem. In any event, this is code that we have been running internally across all OCTEON models for several years. David. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html