From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] ARM64: dts: rockchip: Add GMAC to GeekBox Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:40:15 +0100 Message-ID: <56B8708F.50802@suse.de> References: <1454897859-7601-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1454897859-7601-5-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <5875277.Y7zJ7W9GkY@phil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5875277.Y7zJ7W9GkY@phil> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , devicetree List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, Am 08.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 03:17:33 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: >> Signed-off-by: Andreas F=E4rber >=20 > is there some special reason that gmac, emmc, ir, etc are in separate= =20 > patches? I guess I'll just fold them into the core patch otherwise. Yes, feel free to squash. They are separate because they were not in v1= , it makes them easier to review and I didn't want errors in them to hold up the base .dts. :) For example, SDIO I am still fighting with. Cheers, Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=F6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N=FC= rnberg)