From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladimir Murzin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:14:01 +0000 Message-ID: <56C34AC9.8080509@arm.com> References: <1455617295-23736-1-git-send-email-vladimir.murzin@arm.com> <22011981.Gqc7zXAZ81@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <22011981.Gqc7zXAZ81@wuerfel> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, jslaby-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, andy.shevchenko-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-serial-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Liviu Dudau , Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 16/02/16 11:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 16 February 2016 10:08:05 Vladimir Murzin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch series provide the basic support for running ucLinux on V2M-MPS2 >> platform. >> >> With these patches applied ucLinux can be run on both HW and FVP models >> with Cortex-M3/M4/M7 configurations. > > Looks very nice overall now. I have mentioned a few details that I noticed > but no show-stoppers. > > Most important question for me is how this is going to be maintained > in the long run. Can you add a patch to list the added files in > MAINTAINERS? > > My preference from the arm-soc perspective would be to get pull requests for > this together with vexpress and juno through the existing maintainers > (Liviu, Sudeep, Lorenzo), and have you send your patches to them. Does > that work for you all? > I'm quite happy with either way. I'm not targeting for 4.6, so we have some time to sort it out. Thanks Vladimir > Arnd > > >