From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] tvp5150: remove signal generator as input from the DT binding Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:33:55 -0300 Message-ID: <56CCA613.2000309@osg.samsung.com> References: <1456243798-12453-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <63317542.65NzPYJCcU@avalon> <56CCA3B4.7060700@osg.samsung.com> <4247934.WAaViM8cSf@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4247934.WAaViM8cSf@avalon> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Laurent, On 02/23/2016 03:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Javier, [snip] >>> >>> Shouldn't we revert the patch that introduced connectors support in the DT >>> bindings in the meantime then, to avoid known to be broken bindings from >>> hitting mainline in case we can't fix them in time for v4.6 ? >> >> Yes, that would be a good idea. I've seen recently though a DT binding doc >> that was marked as unstable / work in progress and I wonder if that's a new >> accepted convention for DT binding docs or is just something that slipped >> through review. > > I'm not sure if it's an established practice but I certainly like it. However, > in this specific case, we know that the bindings are broken, so I think a > revert would be better. > Ok, I'll post a revert then that supersedes this patch. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America