From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Add MT8173 Video Encoder Driver and VPU Driver Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:09:44 +0100 Message-ID: <56D04E98.8040209@xs4all.nl> References: <1456215081-16858-1-git-send-email-tiffany.lin@mediatek.com> <56CC1CAB.1060409@xs4all.nl> <56D03DE2.1090400@mm-sol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56D03DE2.1090400@mm-sol.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stanimir Varbanov , Tiffany Lin , Hans Verkuil , daniel.thompson@linaro.org, Rob Herring , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Matthias Brugger , Daniel Kurtz , Pawel Osciak Cc: Eddie Huang , Yingjoe Chen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, PoChun.Lin@mediatek.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 02/26/2016 12:58 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > Hi Hans, > > > >> Nice! >> >> Can you try 'v4l2-compliance -s'? Note that this may not work since I know >> that v4l2-compliance doesn't work all that well with codecs, but I am >> curious what the output is when you try streaming. > > Sorry for the off topic question. > > Does every new v4l2 encoder/decoder driver must use v4l2 mem2mem device > framework, with other words is that mandatory? > No, that's not mandatory. In most cases it will simplify your code, but sometimes it only makes it harder and then you are better off doing it yourself. Regards, Hans