From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joao Pinto Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] add support for DWC UFS Host Controller Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:39:05 +0000 Message-ID: <56D82259.3020907@synopsys.com> References: <2698029.eKNCoG3LWy@wuerfel> <56D718F7.9060200@synopsys.com> <5606371.ipFvUUmgV9@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5606371.ipFvUUmgV9@wuerfel> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann , Joao Pinto Cc: vinholikatti@gmail.com, julian.calaby@gmail.com, akinobu.mita@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, gbroner@codeaurora.org, subhashj@codeaurora.org, CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On 3/2/2016 7:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2016 16:46:47 Joao Pinto wrote: >> On 2/19/2016 3:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Thursday 18 February 2016 17:20:27 Joao Pinto wrote: Facts: - Test Chip type are currently not detectable in runtime through the controller - In the future the Test Chip version will be available in the controller - Test Chip initialization is different for each type - The IP Core version is 1.40a - Test Chip version is 6.00 - Teh UFS version is 2.0 Suggested driver architecture: Platform setup: tc-dwc-g210-pltfrm --> tc-dwc-g210 --> ufshcd-dwc-pltfrm --> ufshcd-dwc --> ufs The test chip platform driver could be called through 2 compatibility strings. indicating the chip's version and bit type: "snps, g210-tc-6.00-20bit" "snps, g210-tc-6.00-40bit" The device tree node would have additional info compatibility strings as the DWC IP core version and UFS version: "snps, dwc-ufshcd-1.40a" "jedec, ufs-2.0" PCI based setup: tc-dwc-g210-pci --> tc-dwc-g210 --> ufshcd-dwc-pci --> ufshcd-dwc --> ufs The test chip type would be configured by a parameter to be passed in the kernel boot args: tc_type = 20 (20-bit) or tc_type = 40 (40-bit) Having this in mind the KConfig would be: "config SCSI_UFS_DWC_HOOKS bool config SCSI_UFS_DWC_PLAT tristate "DesignWare UFS controller platform glue driver" depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM select SCSI_UFS_DWC_HOOKS help This selects the DesignWare UFS host controller platform glue driver. Select this if you have a DesignWare UFS controller on Platform bus. If unsure, say N. config SCSI_UFS_DWC_PCI tristate "DesignWare UFS controller pci glue driver" depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PCI select SCSI_UFS_DWC_HOOKS help This selects the DesignWare UFS host controller pci glue driver. Select this if you have a DesignWare UFS controller on pci bus. If unsure, say N. config SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC bool "Support for the Synopsys Test Chip" depends on SCSI_UFS_DWC_HOOKS && (SCSI_UFSHCD_PCI || SCSI_UFS_DWC_PLAT) ---help--- Synopsys Test Chip is a Phy for prototyping purposes. This selects the support for the Synopsys Test Chip. Select this if you have a Synopsys Test Chip. If unsure, say N." Agree with the approach? Thanks for the help. Joao