From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thor Thayer Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] EDAC, altera: Addition of Arria10 L2 Cache ECC Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:42:20 -0600 Message-ID: <56D9ACDC.5070607@opensource.altera.com> References: <1456850301-22066-1-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <1456850301-22066-3-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <20160304103844.GC16291@pd.tnic> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160304103844.GC16291@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: dougthompson@xmission.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, dinguyen@opensource.altera.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tthayer.linux@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Boris, On 03/04/2016 04:38 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:38:19AM -0600, tthayer@opensource.altera.com wrote: >> From: Thor Thayer >> >> Addition of the Arria10 L2 Cache ECC handling. The major >> changes affect the L2 ECC registers not being grouped >> together. The Arria10 IRQ status needs to be mapped into >> a different region. The mapping occurs in the L2 specific >> function. >> Important changes include: > >> 1) Move private data structure definition to altera_edac.h >> 2) Move Cyclone5 device defines to altera_edac.h > > This should be a separate patch. > >> 3) Split IRQ status and ECC enable/control into separate >> memory areas. > > Ditto. > >> 4) Add IRQ status mapping in L2 ECC dependency checks >> function. > > Ditto... > >> 5) Addition of register offsets in private data structure. >> 6) Changes to code to use register offset define. >> 7) Addition of Arria10 L2 cache private data. >> 8) Add IRQ flags to indicate Exclusive/Shared. > > Do you see where I'm going with this? > > Each patch should countain one logical change: add defines and move > struct, change functionality A, change functionality B, ... > > The fact that you have to make a list of 8 important changes should > already give you a hint that it needs to be split. > > As always, I'm going to need ACKs for the ARM stuff. > OK. I'll split up the changes and resubmit. Thanks!