From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:35:31 +0100 Message-ID: <56DD7593.5060003@suse.de> References: <1457294038-14243-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <56DD7172.4000707@suse.de> <2714888.1DdqvJZ8cb@diego> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2714888.1DdqvJZ8cb@diego> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=c3=bcbner?= Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Giuseppe Cavallaro , LAKML List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko St=FCbner: > Am Montag, 7. M=E4rz 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: >> Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: >>> On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer fin= ds the >>> PHY: >>> >>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found >>> eth0: Could not attach to PHY >>> stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19) >> >> Still with us in next-20160307. CC'ing stmmac maintainers. >=20 > do you remember from what revision you rebased away from, when it was= still=20 > working (as a known-good state)? Hm, next-20160111 possibly... leaving all the 5 days and 4 days ago changes as candidates ("stmmac: share reset function between dwmac100 and dwmac1000" .. "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression"). Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=F6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N=FC= rnberg)