From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:16:30 +0100 Message-ID: <56DEA67E.8090704@suse.de> References: <1457375055-5544-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <525564DD-D0D3-4DEB-9306-3A23288FD83F@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <525564DD-D0D3-4DEB-9306-3A23288FD83F@gmail.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Julien Chauveau Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , linux-rockchip , LAKML , =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=c3=bcbner?= , Dmitry Torokhov , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , devicetree , LKML List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am 08.03.2016 um 10:41 schrieb Julien Chauveau: > Le 8 mars 2016 =C3=A0 09:54, Geert Uytterhoeven a =C3=A9crit : >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >>> Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the >>> gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not device= s. >>> >>> Reported-by: Julien Chauveau >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 -- >>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt = b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt >>> index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt >>> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes: >>> >>> gpio_keys { >>> compatible =3D "gpio-keys"; >>> - #address-cells =3D <1>; >>> - #size-cells =3D <0>; >>> autorepeat; >>> button@21 { >> >> FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1= cdd": >> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied: >> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button@21 has a unit >> name, but no reg property >> >=20 > Hi Andreas, > This means you can also drop the unit-address (the @21 part) for the = button. > What about using a more relevant name like "key_up" instead of "butto= n"? Or in my case power-key or power-button. Or would just power suffice? The Landingship baseboard does have four more buttons not yet enabled, so I do need some way to distinguish nodes. Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG= N=C3=BCrnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html